“Comics Should Be Good” on Grant Morrison’s “Flex Mentallo”

May 12th, 2008

“What exactly is the Silver Age? According to most people, the Silver Age in comics began in 1956 when the Flash returned to superhero comics.

Morrison himself, in an issue of Flash, claimed that the Silver Age began in 1955. Being as general as possible, the Silver Age is a time in comics when superheroes were defined by science, specifically nuclear science, and outer space (Flash, Green Lantern, Hawkman, the Fantastic Four, Spider-Man, the Hulk, et al.).

The stories tended to be fantastical explorations of either outer space or inner space, with science looked at as both as help and a sinister influence. There’s also, to be honest, both a naïveté to the stories and, if you’re looking for it, a subtle hint of the creators taking way too many drugs.

I have no idea if the creators back then were smoking pot and dropping acid before they sat down to draw and write, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it were true. The Silver Age ended, I suppose, when the new and improved X-Men burst onto the scene in 1975. Maybe.”


(Art by Frank Quitely, Flex Mentallo)

The above? From here. And so is this:

Many people read comics like this and think that Morrison is in love with Silver Age comics. Certainly, he has done a lot of work that indicates he holds the inherent goofiness of the comics from those years in high esteem. His latest project, All Star Superman, is practically a love letter to the Silver Age.

It’s not as good as Flex Mentallo, however, because Flex is specifically a critique of the Silver Age, as it wends its way through comic book history and shows that those comics were not as innocent as we’d like to view them through our rose-colored glasses. Morrison is certainly interested in exploring certain themes of the Silver Age, but he rarely writes comics that whole-heartedlylaud those bygone days (All Star Superman does, of course, and JLA did, to a certain extent, but that’s about it). He’s far less enamoured of writing “Silver Age” stories and far more interested in looking at why those stories enchant us and what that says about our fascination with superheroes’ perversions and glories.

Those two things, Morrison points out, are often intertwined, and therefore we can’t speak of one without speaking of the other. At first glance, Flex Mentallo certainly appears to be a homage to the Silver Age, but it’s not.

Flex spends a lot of time thinking about “the good old days,” but Morrison has his narrator, Wallace Sage, point out that during the Silver Age, things started to get a little weird. “It was like the hard body [of the Golden Age hero] began to turn soft, the masculine heroes becoming fluid and feminine, always changing shape. … All that stuff was like, like a prophecy of the arrival of LSD on the streets of America … the comic writers and artist intuited the social transformation in their work …”

In the text pieces that appear in issues #2 and 4 that tell the history of Flex the character, Morrison goes further than that, flatly stating that the publishers and writers and artists of the Silver Age were all drug-using degenerates (I say that in the nicest possible way).

The funny thing about the Silver Age has always been that these were grown men writing and drawing these books, and even if they were done for children, the subtext is always much darker. Writers in the 1950s knew about homosexuals, and they knew that people would read Batman and Robin’s living arrangements differently if they were adults than if they were children.

Adults might not have been reading comics in the 1950s, which is why they could get away with some weird stuff, but it’s fairly obvious what’s going on underneath the surface in many Silver Age comic books.
Morrison’s genius is that he is able to write a wonderful parody of the time period without coming off as condescending.

Flex’s arch-nemesis, the Mentallium Man, is both a perfect Silver Age creation that wouldn’t look out of place in a Superman comic from 1958 as well as a critique of those very comics - the powers of the Mentallium are odd, to say the least: pink Mentallium invites the victim “to explore complex issues of gender and sexuality,” while silver Mentallium robs someone of their sense of humor. These powers show us that the Silver Age was in fact a hotbed of twisted emotional traumas and discoveries, as the creators worked out their fears and dreams on the page. Morrison does the same thing, and does it brilliantly.

With Much Love, Of Course

December 11th, 2007

ALAN MOORE PLOT:
PROTAGONIST: Watch as I become unto a god.
(They do.)
END

GRANT MORRISON PLOT:
NEWSVENDOR: Hi, Mister Morrison. Here for your weekly shipment, I’d wager.
GRANT: Yes, my good man. What do you have in for me this week, my friend?

NEWSVENDOR: Well, let’s see. We have the Robert Anton Wilson Quarterly, Wired, and Mandelbrot Monthly,
(GRANT begins to take acid) The Zoomorphic Express: “Young Werther” Edition, She-Gems of Canton, Ish 2, Vol. 12 …
(several hours later)
… and Foamy Roaring Steeds, Country Music Television Digest, and I think that’s it.
GRANT: A thousand cluster-eggs of the Tau Ceti Nebula approach. ACTIVATE THE TWIN DEADSTAR CLUSTERS OF THE KRAK’ULA THOUGHT MATRIX! POWERED BY THE DREAD FRACTAL ENTROPIES OF THE MACULATE FORM! GO-HAMMER!
NEWSVENDOR: Sir.
GRANT: “Here is the Book that Was to Be Broken,” says Mr. Silence. The man wears no hat.
NEWSVENDOR: Sir, please. Not again.
GRANT: BEHOLD THE MILLION-FORCE ARSENAL OF THE FENIX HORIZON! I BEHOLD THE STARS AND THE ENDLESS WALL THAT COMES BETWEEN!
NEWSVENDOR: Oh, Christ. Might as well (takes up a megaphone from beneath the stand, points it at GRANT). YOUR ARE NOT THE BLACK RIDER! YOU ARE NOT OF HIS FLESH! COME NOT NEAR OUR FAERIE QUEEN!
GRANT: WHO?
NEWSVENDOR: I DESIRE THE ACQUAINTANCE OF THE FIFTH BROTHER!
GRANT: WHO CAN BREAK THIS WONDERWALL? WHO? (weeps)
NEWSVENDOR: There, there. (pats GRANT on his back) Well, uh, I take it you’ll want this new issue of “Highlights for Children” as well.
GRANT: Is there “Goofus and Gallant”?
(Much later)
GRANT: Ha! This is the best one yet!

WARREN ELLIS PLOT:
WARREN: Pardon me, Job Counselor, there’s been a mistake. I filled out the employment sheet for “Astronaut,” not “Miserable Bastard.”
COUNSELOR: Oh, I’m sorry. You’re English, so that disqualifies you, automatically.
(WARREN grumbles about it for the next twenty years)

Powered by ScribeFire.

“You Bees Make Honey, But Not Just For Yourselves”: The Problem with Mark Millar

December 6th, 2007

Written laws are like spiders’ webs, and will like them only entangle and hold the poor and weak, while the rich and powerful will easily break through them.
- Anacharsis, to Solon when writing his laws

Always act like you’re wearing an invisible crown, I do.
- Paris Hilton

Anacharsis probably wouldn’t like Mark Millar, who loves a lord. Not since Tom Wolfe has there been a writer so enamored of the priveleged and potent. In Millarworld, the Gatsbys and Buchanans wear capes or skintight leather, but the message is still the same: bow before Mithras.

For guys who follow this line of thought, which passes through the suburbs of Rand on its way to Mt. Invictus Sol, even the idea of, say, bringing back lettres cachet wouldn’t be enough. If I was the kind of man to biographize, I would say Millar is like Cameron Crowe, in that he never got to sit with the cool kids in High School (neither did the rest of us, gentlemen), and, as a result, his entire creative life, raveled out, has been spent imagining what it’s like on the other side of the glass.
He’s a Scot, so their neuroses are different. Maybe he wore the wrong tartan or kilt to school one day. Those clan rumbles can be nasty. In Crowe’s case , however — which I only know courtesy of ye olde Lester Bangs, polemicist — it was being the kid dork on a bus full of rockers (”Play us a song on your wee guitar, Cameron”). But the effect was the same: both spend their time wondering, “what would it be like to be someone whom others make exceptions for?” What’s it like to be one of the Beautiful People? “What goes on in Wonka’s chocolate factory? Oh, if only I was an Oompa-Loompa and knew!”

Except what saves Crowe is that he eventually sees, and has his characters see, that the entire charade is ridiculous. Lester Bangs could and did make his complaint against Crowe, but Crowe is no Millar. Sure, “Vanilla Sky” starts off as paean to how awesome Tom Cruise’s life is, but by the end, we learn being the Lord of your own earth is no fun (Jason Lee is your friend). Likewise for “Almost Famous” (Mom is real and Stillwater is a bag of shallow homunculi, which, considering Jason Lee’s in there, is not a surprise).

What is good? All that heightens the feeling of power in man, the will to power, power itself. What is bad? All that is born of weakness. What is happiness? The feeling that power is growing, that resistance is overcome.

- Nietzsche, “The Antichrist”

There’s “Jerry Maguire,” where Crowe’s opening shot has us meet all of mankind’s top jocks, destined to beat all of us up one day, and actually has Renee Zellweger say, “First class is what’s wrong. It used to be a better meal. Now it’s a better life.” (The script directions actually read “She is now craning out into the aisle to hear this story. The plane is now quieter. She listens to the easy sound of Jerry discussing his charmed life”) That’s *before* we meet Cruise’s fiancee — if there’s a DuPont Guide of BSDM, she would be in every issue, like Oprah is in “O.” But we learn, at length, how awesome all of that is not. Man, Nietzsche would have hated Crowe.

And he wrote *all* of this after posing undercover at a high school for “Fast Times,” which I *know* must have somehow been the inspiration for Drew Barrymore’s “Never Been Kissed” where a reporter who was a dork in high school gets to go back and be cool.

The best statement of this philosophy is in “Say Anything,” when Ione Skye’s glamorous life gets razed to the ground by a John Mahoney-hunting Internal Revenue Service (he ends up in jail, and then hides as the Fraiser paterfamilias, still in Seattle) By the end of the movie — around the time her father starts making shivs in the big house — poor Diane Court is has been so disillusioned by her road trip into the existential Balkans that a kickboxer’s car, baptised by rain, is the only refuge. Too many people remember John C. holding up the boombox outside stately Court manor; less recollected are the Lynchesque scenes where the protagonist steers his great streetwhale down the dark and rain-wet streets, dictating to himself in a tape recorder like Twin Peaks’ Agent Cooper, recording field messages to send back to Diane in the home office. But I digress, and big time, as usual.

To the point, then. Never mind that John Cusack created what Chuck Klostermann called an unattainable model for romantic manhood that men have been expected to attain (and failed) since the movie’s release (the first time I ever heard of “Say Anything” was when my eccentric, brilliant, and un-mainstream-as-you-can-be cousin E. referred to Cusack’s character as “the perfect man”) — if creating impossible standards for American masculinity was a hanging offense, then Bogart, Peck, Wayne, Mr. Fonda and Tyler Durden would have been collected from the branches of the sour apple tree a long time ago.

The point is, Crowe sees through the gold mist. Cusack’s hero is a little older, a lot deflowered, and broken of nose by the end of “Say Anything” but he’s still the same man as in the beginning. It’s Diane Court who’s changed. Her father’s world of possessions, control, and safety has been shown for the sham it is, and good riddance. It’s not so Parsifal the kickboxer has won (although he has), as the High Life has been tried, and found wanting. Millar would have had nothing to do with Lloyd Dobler, I assure you. “Bonesmen first, God second.”

No wonder Spider-man is his favorite hero. (see “Wizard” where he and Jeph Loeb (champion of the Bat) square off). Spider-man is the self-flagellant of superherodom, a nerd who became a god, and one of the three most beloved characters in comic, plus he’s married to a supermodel. I’m surprised Millar didn’t end his run with Spidey coked to the gills running a Porsche over Ben Parker’s grave. Maybe that was in the original draft, true believer.

Try this trick and spin it: every single script the man’s ever written gets stamped, like a coin shaped in the great machines of Newton’s Royal Mint, with Millar’s trademark fantasy: the cool kids invite you in. Usually, but not always, this takes the form of:

1) a band of shadowy self-involved technocrats come to the inheritance of the Earth,
2) a guy outside the system has the chance to join. He either does, or attempts to subvert it and place himself in power.

Aside from Trouble, and his work with Grant Morrison (who dilutes Millar with the alloy of genius), find me one series of his that doesn’t have both 1 and 2.

Okay, yes, the blood kin of Walter Mitty are endemic habitués to Planet Fiction’s adventure continent, sure. Who hasn’t shopped around for a Fantasticar in their own way? But in the same way that there’s a big difference between people those who read Choose Your Own Adventure Books and those who literally choose their own adventures, there’s a long way to walk between high school and the rest of life. If Millar ever saw “Porgy ‘n’ Bess,” he would cheer for Sportin’ Life.

Alan Moore Talks Anarchism

October 8th, 2007

Well I suppose I first got involved in radical politics as a matter of course, during the late 1960s when it was a part of the culture. The counterculture, as we called it then, was very eclectic and all embracing. It included fashions of dress, styles of music, philosophical positions, and, inevitably, political positions.

And although there would be various political leanings coming to the fore from time to time, I suppose that the overall consensus political standpoint was probably an anarchist one. Although probably back in those days, when I was a very young teenager, I didn’t necessarily put it into those terms.

Powered by ScribeFire.

Totems, True Believer (Part I)

January 30th, 2007


HAS IT BEEN duly noted how powerfully symbolic Batman’s villains really are? J. Michael Straczynski was on the right track when he noted, in the pages of Amazing Spider-Man, that so many of Peter Parker’s adversaries were adversarial totems; rivals for the affections of the beast powers, those animistic and secret chiefs of the Earth. Animal spirits as bestowers of gifts far beyond the ken of average men — this is an ancient notion, and often played. Campbell floated the notion that the first real giver of myth was the animal master, the organizer and herder of sacred game, shepherd of the stock of the field, who commanded the creatures that were both prey and predator to early man. Spider-man, seen this way, is one more example of the atavistic sink backing up…until poetaster-as-plumber like yours truly comes along to explain whichwhere the pipes are going to…

No wonder, say the various mouthpieces of JMS’ conceit, that you fight the Scorpion/Rhino/Goblin/Venom/Doctor Octopus twice a week and thrice on Sundays…you’re a neon bulge of totemic endowal, old chum; upon your shoulders, Mr. Parker, has fallen Responsibility, and not just of the I-killed-my-uncle-through- inaction-and-must-atone kind. Of the cosmic, animistic kind. Life’s idiot savant as spider-messiah, bumbling teen as sacred chalice. It’s like something out of Wagner — Parsifal, to be precise:

Parsifal: (vor grossen Schmerz sich aufbäumend) Und ich, ich bin’s, der all’ dies Elend schuf! Ha! Welcher Sünden, welches [welcher] Frevels Schuld muss dieses Toren Haupt seit Ewigkeit belasten, da keine Busse, keine Sühne der Blindheit mich entwindet, zur Rettung selbst ich auserkoren, in Irrnis wild verloren der Rettung letzter Pfad mir schwindet!

Parsifal: (writhing in great pain) And I, I am the one who caused all this misery! Ah! What sins, what offending guilt must this fool’s head bear from all eternity; then no penance, no atonement, can excuse my blindness to the mission for which I was chosen, lost in wandering the last path of deliverance escapes me!


Parsifal, or Percival, or Parzival — whatever spelling you prefer, there are so very many — is “”By compassion made wise, the pure fool,” raised innocent in a forest, knowing neither good nor evil. Peter Parker was raised by his Aunt in Forest Hills…ah, but that’s another story for another time…

Now, Marvel Editorship has been a bit leery of picking up this particular gauntlet, and no wonder, because it’s deep rooting as far as Joey Q is concerned and JMS tends to botch things badly at the end, Loki-at-Ragnarok type missteps. Imagine Dick Cheney trying to mount his twentieth tween prostitute of the week and failing at the critical moment of orgasm, and you the entire history of the scribe of Babylon 5’s art. Rapid ascension up the neurosexual ladder in the full flush of the hunt, blood risen to the cheeks and other extremities — then a moment’s stall, and now we’re doubting, but surely it’s a moment’s interruption — yes, here we are, climbing higher, higher — excitement, ah ah…and then…sloooooow descent into incontinence, and frustration, and grumbling from all other parties engaged. Read “Rising Stars” and weep.

But as foul a spoiler of dramatic humours he may be, however consistent he is in screwing up his own finely-crafted machinery of plot, it must be said that whatever morbid principle infects his judgment in his arrangement does not carry over to his invention, his insight, at least in the early stages. The understanding the author brings to the character is almost always ingenious, and at the very least, never boring. He possesses an insight into the essential archetype of a character — in its own way similar to what Alexander Pope called, in Shakespeare’s case, “a talent very peculiar — something between Penetration and Felicity…”

And so he “discovered,” or claimed to have uncovered, very cleverly, for our modern readership, a long-hidden secret, like Pompeii under the ashes of Vesuvius. But like the Piltdown man, these gems — which always seem to be brought to light at the beginning of a new writer’s arc — are forgeries; retcons, as they’re called. It’s like the Donation of Constantine; every year some new bit of historical trivia seems to turn up verifying that conspiracies, plots, repressed memories, old meetings, secret agends, forbidden loves, and hidden friendships took place in some dusty, heretofore unrevealed corner of the past. Perhaps that’s because comic book superheroes are so hit and miss — like monarchial lines or revolutionary governments, they come into this world not trailing clouds of glory but the barest bones of a concept, maybe a fragment or a cigarette-butt of a notion (”A wolverine? Hm. He should have claws”) or a small midden of notions (DaVinci’s flying machine, Zorro, The Shadow, The Phantom, Sherlock Holmes, Dick Tracy, Jimmie Dale, The Green Hornet, Spring Heeled Jack, The Bat, Dracula all melt into one and become Batman). Sometimes real discoveries are made that come from that forgotten country, the past, (Frank Miller remembers what Finger and Kane’s Batman was *actually* like and writes “The Dark Knight Returns”) and then “rebirth,” like the overused term “renaissance,” is more appropriate than the old nostrum of “reinvention.” Is it not as the Florentine humanist Marsilio Ficino said, in a letter to Paul of Middelburg. In 1492 Ficino was in this state of mind:

What the poets once sang of the four ages, lead, iron, silver and gold, our Plato in The Republic transferred to the four talents of men, assigning to some talents a certain leaden quality implanted in them by nature, to others iron, to others silver and to still others gold. If then we are to call any age golden, it is beyond doubt that age which brings forth golden talents in different places. That such is true of our age he who wishes to consider the illustrious discoveries of this century will hardly doubt. For if we are to call any age golden, it is beyond doubt that age which brings forth golden talents in different places. That such is true of this our age [no one] will hardly doubt. For this century, like a golden age, has restored to light the liberal arts, which were almost extinct: grammar, poetry, rhetoric, painting, sculpture, architecture, music, the ancient singing of songs to the Orphic lyre, and all this in Florence. Achieving what had been honored among the ancients, but almost forgotten since, the age has joined wisdom with eloquence, and prudence with the military art. . . . This century appears to have perfected astronomy, in Florence it has recalled the Platonic teaching from darkness into light . . . and in Germany . . . [there] have been invented the instruments for printing books….

Three eras: Iron Age Hut, The Silver Age of Comics, and The Golden Age of Ficino’s Florence.

Printing books, eh? We still have wits of our own age that engage in that traffic — often estranged from the men who buy the ink by barrel, but that, too, is another detour.

JMS didn’t pull something out of the recesses of Spider-history, because, to my knowledge, Lee and Ditko and the rest of the Webfathers never explored the notion that Spider-Man’s rivals were anything more than intervals of bad luck and the bane of Pete’s harem (sorry, Gwen), to say nothing of even acknowledging the possibility that the Vulture, Scorpion, Tarantula, Goblin, Octopus, et al., were challengers to some sort of archetypal Lord -of-the-Flies Animal Throne. God, far from it. How can you be King of the Forest and Animal Master Ordinary and Extraordinary when you’re fretting over J. Jonah Jameson’s distempers?

The main theme in ritual is the linking of the individual to a larger morphological structure than that of his own physical body. Man lives by killing, and there is a sense of guilt connected with that. Burials suggest that my friend has died, and he survives. The animals that I have killed must also survive. Early hunters usually had a kind of animal divinity — the technical name would be animal master, the animal who is the master animal. The animal master sends the flocks to be killed. The need to be part of someting larger than one, it seems, is a constant theme throughout humanity… even in the prehistoric times. There’s always been a need for an afterlife (to my knowledge, through most of written history, it seems, anyway), to believe that there’s more than the short time we spend on earth. I could see the guilt thing, I suppose. We don’t want to die, so why should our food? I can see the logic in the animal divinity, too. Usually, the afterlife belief comes with divinity. If the divine wants you to kill to live, it only makes sense that the divine version of the animal you kill would send your prey in your direction. And, of course, it makes sense that they would have rituals thanking the animal divinity for a successful hunt.
– Joseph Campbell, The Power of Myth

Spider-Man, of course, keeps murdering his rivals. I mean this metaphorically, of course. Either he sends them back to the symbolic underworld of the the prison — or, sometimes, they accidentally die during battle with the Spider, through no fault of the hero’s own.

What could be plainer? Spider-Man kills his enemies. And they return. Over and over and over again.

And like his namesake, the spider lives from the blood of his animi. Apart from their role in demarcating his identity and providing a reason for his existence, through their sacrifice, the Spider is renewed, made stronger, better.

We still worship Arachne, the spider-godddess, as Protectress of our Society. Think about that the next time you browse “the web” or engage in what they call “networking” — as if the sort of men who mint phrases like these could comprehend or imagine the ancestry and complexity of the spinnings they fetishize in language, but don’t bother to understand in fact. We’re never more than a yard away from a spider, none of us. Not so much your friendly neighborhood Spider-Man, as your friendly corner and closet and pillow and bedsheet and wall and fixture and rug and cupboard and desk and table and tool and shed and anywhere else you can think of Spider-Man. And sure, let’s go by the relatively conservative estimate of 250,000 spiders per acre of arable land on earth, reckoned in accordance with the 12 million acres of farmable stead currently worldwide. That’s 3 trillian spiders, 12 trillion if you’re willing to go at the numbers like a drunk logothete and grant the somewhat liberal estimate of 2 million per acre. That’s 96 trillion legs shuttling around in the dark, eating more weight in insect carcasses, per year, than the entire weight of the human population on earth. Makes you feel warm, doesn’t it?

And: during the average human life, eight spiders are eaten during sleep.

Your sleep.

You’re already taking holy communion. Eating the sacred flesh. Drinking the sacred venom. Threading your insides with digested fragments of the True Silk. Why not go one step further?

So why not a Spider-God?

When a spider makes a beautiful web, the beauty comes out of the spider’s nature. It’s instinctinve beauty. Of course it’s beautiful. It’s the first thing that I notice with every fresh web I see. And, I tell you, back in Florida, we’d see enormous ones. But the second thought that I would have is that it’s a beautiful, elaboate trap designed to capture prey. Beauty in nature typically occurs with a purpose.
– Joseph Campbell, The Power of Myth
As to re: Where does Batman fit into all of this? Why all this talk of totems? Sure, we get that Spider-Man is an animal god trying to beat back the hordes who want to claim his powers and legitimacy for their own. Understood. Crystal. We’re done with that. But when are you getting to the point? Batman and Spider- man: true eaters of parasites both. “Well done, thou good and faithful servant. But what have they to do with the other?” Good question.


Next time. All to be revealed in time….

June 1938

December 28th, 2006

…The darkness of it was heavy–cold, dirt, sickness, ignorance, and want, were the lords in waiting on the saintly presence–nobles of great power all of them; but, most especially the last. Samples of a people that had undergone a terrible grinding and regrinding in the mill, and certainly not in the fabulous mill which ground old people young, shivered at every corner, passed in and out at every doorway, looked from every window, fluttered in every vestige of a garment that the wind shook. The mill which had worked them down, was the mill that grinds young people old; the children had ancient faces and grave voices; and upon them, and upon the grown faces, and ploughed into every furrow of age and coming up afresh, was the sigh, Hunger.

It was prevalent everywhere. Hunger was pushed out of the tall houses, in the wretched clothing that hung upon poles and lines; Hunger was patched into them with straw and rag and wood and paper; Hunger was repeated in every fragment of the small modicum of firewood that the man sawed off; Hunger stared down from the smokeless chimneys, and started up from the filthy street that had no offal, among its refuse, of anything to eat. Hunger was the inscription on the baker’s shelves, written in every small loaf of his scanty stock of bad bread; at the sausage-shop, in every dead-dog preparation that was offered for sale. Hunger rattled its dry bones among the roasting chestnuts in the turned cylinder; Hunger was shred into atomics in every farthing porringer of husky chips of potato, fried with some reluctant drops of oil. Its abiding place was in all things fitted to it.

– Dickens, “A Tale of Two Cities”


When there was not enough whale oil or coal oil, there were not enough lamps to go around. Some said that what was needed was social engineering, to move more people to the lamplight available. What was really needed was one Edison.
— Buckminster Fuller, quoted in James Robinson’s “Starman”